RON PAULITICS: Fox News Judge Napolitano Endorses Ron Paul



Uploaded by: BlackKrishnaverse
Video Description:
This is the opening of a clip from a speech by Judge Andrew Napolitano, a contributor to Fox News. Don't be fooled by the fact that most Fox folks are scum since the Left vs. Right crap just teaches us to stop listening to each other instead of figuring out how we're both screwed, he's also one of the biggest defenders of the constitution and rights and freedoms in the world. You can see the full speech here and another more recent brilliant speech below it:
Andrew Napolitano at FFF Conference, Part 1 of 4
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8QwTKKSvR8
.
NAPOLITANO AT REASON IN DC
Fox News legal analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano is among the fiercest defenders of individual rights. Both in his daily appearances on the country's most-watched cable news network and in a series of books (most recently, A Nation of Sheep), Napolitano consistently and defiantly argues that the only legitimate government is that which respects its citizens rights in all cases.
In late October, Napolitano gave the keynote address at the conference Reason in DC, where he delivered a spellbinding speech that blended a masterful understanding of American history with a blazing outrage at the excesses of the new security state. "Who is the greatest violator of the Constitution?" asks Napolitano. "George W. Bush has shown less fidelity to the Constitution than any president since Abraham Lincoln."
Click to view the Judge's speech (approx 40 minutes).
http://reason.tv/video/show/178.html
.
Ron Paul Excluded from Fox News Forum
Larry Fester
USA Daily
December 29, 2007
Republican fund raising frontrunner Ron Paul will be excluded from a Fox News Forum scheduled for just two days before the New Hampshire Primary.
Paul's campaign said that according to the New Hampshire State Republican Party and an Associated Press report, Republican presidential candidate and Texas Congressman Ron Paul will be excluded from an upcoming forum of Republican candidates to be broadcast by Fox News on January 6, 2008. The decision appears to have been made by Fox News.
"Given Ron Paul's support in New Hampshire and his recent historic fundraising success, it is outrageous that Dr. Paul would be excluded," said Ron Paul 2008 campaign chairman Kent Snyder. "Dr. Paul has consistently polled higher in New Hampshire than some of the other candidates who have been invited."
Snyder continued, "Paul supporters should know that we are continuing to make inquiries with Fox News as to why they have apparently excluded Dr. Paul from this event."
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=1454
.
ENDGAME: The Movie
For the New World Order, a world government is just the beginning. Once in place they can engage their plan to exterminate 80% of the world's population, while enabling the "elites" to live forever with the aid of advanced technology. For the first time, crusading filmmaker ALEX JONES reveals their secret plan for humanity's extermination:
Operation ENDGAME.
* Watch as Jones and his team track the elusive Bilderberg Group to Ottawa and Istanbul to document their secret summits, allowing you to witness global kingpins setting the world's agenda and instigating World War III.
* Learn about the formation of the North America transportation control grid, which will end U.S. sovereignty forever.
* Discover how the practitioners of the pseudo-science eugenics have taken control of governments worldwide as a means to carry out depopulation.
* View the progress of the coming collapse of the United States and the formation of the North American Union.
Endgame is not conspiracy theory, it is documented fact in the elite's own words.
http://www.endgamethemovie.com/
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1070329053600562261
.
ENDGAME: The Bibliography
http://www.endgamethemovie.com/biblio01.html
.
Peace, (NOW!!!)
BK
_______________________
.
Black Krishna Brand
Philosophy - http://blackkrishna.blogspot.com/
Music - http://www.soundclick.com/bands/0/blackkrishna.htm
MySpace - http://www.myspace.com/blackkrishnaverse
YouTube - http://www.youtube.com/BlackKrishnaverse
Archive - http://www.archive.org/search.php?query=Black%20Krishna
.
Welcome to 21st Century Propaganda...
We hope you enjoyed your stay and will be leaving shortly...
http://www.Infowars.com
http://www.PrisonPlanet.com
http://www.SaveTheInternet.com
http://www.FreedomtoFascism.com
http://www.CanadianActionParty.ca
http://www.CuttingThroughTheMatrix.com
http://www.RestoreTheRepublic.com
http://www.RogueGovernment.com
http://www.911dvdproject.com
http://www.WeAreChange.org
http://www.RonPaul2008.com
http://www.JackMcLamb.com
http://www.TruthNews.us
http://www.StopLying.ca
http://www.LegitGov.org
http://www.wtprn.com - radio
South Park breaks down the herd... http://allsp.com/

Related Videos
Judge Andrew Napolitano bamboozledAaron Russo on FOX News (2004)10/2/08 Andrew Napolitano Pork=Bribary
judge-andrew-napolitano-bamboozled.htmljudge-andrew-napolitano-bamboozled.htmljudge-andrew-napolitano-bamboozled.html
Dennis Kucinich asked about Ron Paul on Free Minds TVRon Paul Owns Neil CavutoRon Paul Hits Out At "Arrogant" Greenspan
judge-andrew-napolitano-bamboozled.htmljudge-andrew-napolitano-bamboozled.htmljudge-andrew-napolitano-bamboozled.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
This wacked out ... ( 5 months ago by MarkDouglasC)
This wacked out Judge is an idiot. Strange, cause he looks so smart on Court TV.
This idiot judge rails against Lincoln suspending Habeaus -- here is a clue you moron. The constitution SAYS you can suspend it you idiot in "times of rebellion"
What the futt do you think the civil war was you idiot? It was rebellion. So Lincoln had the RIGHT and DUTY to suspend it -- read the constitution.
The states did have ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
The states did have the right, okay? I know it seems unfair to you, but there's a lot of unfair things in this world protected by the law.
Take Bill Gates. He made a fortune by monopolizing the computer industry. He was in charge of Microsoft spying on Apple and stealing one of their genius ideas before it was even introduced to the market (which, might I add, made Microsoft rich.)
That doesn't make him a criminal. That doesn't mean we can just blast his door down and take all of his money.
The top people in ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
The top people in the California Teachers Association give themselves EXTREMELY expensive summer vacations, courtesy of the teachers off of whose paychecks they get deducted. Anyone on the board who says anything against them gets kicked out so he/she can't say anymore.
But nobody has the right to plant bombs under these people's vacation homes.
Mr Zab well thats ... ( 5 months ago by MarkDouglasC)
Mr Zab well thats all interesting -- but what the heck does that have to do with the judge and habeaus and what we were talking about.
I never heard that Gates stole the idea for Windows.
Its true that the law can't make things fair - or I would have four big breasted blond women in my bed every night, competing for my attention.
Ron Paul said ... ( 5 months ago by MarkDouglasC)
Ron Paul said Lincoln was wrong to use force to stop slavery. Thats what the man said. Therefore, he puts a state's right to have slavery -- even though he himself is against slavery -- over anyone's right to stop slavery.
In other words -- Paul claims states can have slavery, and no one can stop them.
The pharmaceuticals ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
The pharmaceuticals pass out drugs BEFORE they're tested. They even lobby so that these medications are mandatory. People die because of it.
Does the Supreme Court have the right to make selling all untested drugs illegal?
Does the Supreme Court have the right to pass laws against corporations?
The right to dismantle and choose the leadership of the teachers unions?
Do they have the right to outlaw unhealthy food?
Or infringe on the banks' rights to charge SUPER HIGH interest rates on loans?
Forget that last ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
Forget that last post. Sorry.
Responding to this one: Not can have. Could have. Ron Paul's not calling for a return to slavery, so what's it matter to you MDC? So, he believes the states had the right to do those things; that's just his interpretation of the Constitution. It doesn't make him a bad candidate for president.
You act like Ron Paul is horrible because of it, but the truth is, it can't hurt anyone that he believes that way. The whole matter is in the past.
If he says that we ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
If he says that we aught to return to slavery, he'll lose all of his votes, so really, you have nothing to worry about, MarkDouglasC. He can't hurt anyone but the lobbyists.
Id rather have ... ( 5 months ago by MarkDouglasC)
Id rather have someone in office that put the rights of people over the rights of "states" to have slavery if they want it.
States rights was always an excuse to have and keep slavery. The real reason they wanted slavery -- greed, and all the women they could rape.
True... but the ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
True... but the alternative to Ron Paul doesn't look pretty. Either John McCain, who supports interference with whatever countries we darn well please, or Obama, who's made no real accomplishment and is relying on "character" to get elected.
So, Ron Paul believes it could have been solved without force. That's one of the few things I disagree with Ron Paul on. (After Bleeding Kansas and Fort Sumter, it's pretty clear there was nothing anyone could have done to stop the Civil War.)
I disagree with ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
I disagree with McCain on his foreign policy, and that's a big issue. I disagree with Obama on abortion, gun control, and "separation of church and state" and those concern our freedoms of religion and right to defend ourselves.
And I disagree with Ron Paul about a history book.
Yes, and force ... ( 5 months ago by MarkDouglasC)
Yes, and force wasnt used to stop slavery at the start. The force -- the war -- was there anyway, started by the south. Lincoln would have been an idiot not to end slavery when it became possible to do so BECAUSE of the force, the war.
True. According to ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
True. According to history, the war was inevitable. And even though Lincoln is remembered as being the one who freed the slaves,
"If I could end the war without freeing a single slave, I would do so. If I could end the war and free all the slaves, I would do so."
His commitment was to ending the bloodshed between South and North.
No Ron Paul isnt ... ( 5 months ago by MarkDouglasC)
No Ron Paul isnt horrible, sorry if I gave that impression. I like Paul on some things -- honesty, and he knows we can't borrow our way to prosperity.
Slavery is in the past -- but understanding who has rights is not. People have rights. States are constructs in your head. I'd rather have someone more intelligent about such things than Dr. Paul
Which state would ... ( 5 months ago by TehW00terMan)
Which state would make slavery legal again?
None. I never said ... ( 5 months ago by MarkDouglasC)
None. I never said they would. Dr Paul is anti slavery. But if a state decided to enact slavery -- he thinks no one has a right to use force to stop that. I think a lot of people have a right to use force to stop it - including the slaves themselves.
Perhaps the slaves ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
Perhaps the slaves and the people have those rights, but then again, that's the debate between Federalists and--I think-- Democratic-Republicans that goes WAY back in time; whether the states aught to have more rights or the Federal government. That goes back to Jefferson, Madison and Washington. That's one of the debates that formed our Constitution!
You're a Federalist ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
You're a Federalist. That's clear. And I don't hold it against you. I'll need to look it up to see exactly who, but a lot of great minds were Federalists. The same goes for the Democratic-Republicans. Apparently Ron Paul is more Democratic-Republican. The Constitution doesn't help much here actually...
"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." Amendment 10
This leaves it open ... ( 5 months ago by MrZaborskii)
This leaves it open to debate, which, I believe, is exactly what the Founding Fathers wanted. Because I believe--and I don't know how many other people watching this video believe this--but I believe that this nation was "conceived in Liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal." I believe this nation was created free.
5 S☆ars ( 4 months ago by 000stryke3000)
5 S☆ars
Let hear ya say ... ( 4 months ago by lookingforghosts)
Let hear ya say HELL YEAH!!!
Obama's a member of ... ( 3 months ago by procommenter)
Obama's a member of the Council on Foreign Relations in Manhattan whose founder, nonogenarian David Rockefeller [grandson of John D. Rockefeller, of Standard Oil {1839-1937}], has stated that the goal of C.F.R. is to create a 1-world govt. McCain, Cheney, the Clintons & Bushes are members of C.F.R. & ascribe to Rockefeller's philosophy.
That's a slippery ... ( 2 months ago by azjunglist05)
That's a slippery slope right there. First of all, Ron Paul would be considered a Libertarian on most of his views. He believes that people should have the freedom to do as they please so long as it does not infringe on others personal freedoms. So since slavery forces people into a submissive state, Ron Paul would not allow any state to grossly cause any such injustices to an individuals freedom. Please, make your arguments logical.
Array ( 3 weeks ago by chicky123sb)
im angry
my messenger info is in my youtube profile! MSG me on M.S.N! XN



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code